Friday, November 16, 2012
Monday, August 27, 2012
Dear Haters
To all my haters,
I have started a successful business. I have an excellent GPA in college, where I am pursuing my passion for law. I am surrounded by my fantastic family and friends who love me. With so much to be proud of I cannot possibly muster up the slightest concern for what you think about me. Hope there are no hard feelings. Good luck with starting fights over the internet, but in your future asshole activities go sell your brand of crazy somewhere else.
Thank you bunches,
Penelope
..........................................................................No fucks were found.
Friday, August 10, 2012
Saturday, August 4, 2012
Epic Morning Find
Some times I worry that I waste too much time on the internet. Than I find something as epic as this, and I know it was worth it.
Sunday, March 11, 2012
Obama's Impeachment Proceedings Has Begun
Ok I posted this on my facebook but the link wont work, but if you don't believe me google H.CON.RES.107.IH
Bill Text
H.CON.RES.107 -- Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high... (Introduced in House - IH)
HCON 107 IH
112th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. CON. RES. 107 Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Mr. JONES submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
Whereas the cornerstone of the Republic is honoring Congress's exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it
I will post the text here.
Bill Text
112th Congress (2011-2012)
H.CON.RES.107.IH
THIS SEARCH THIS DOCUMENT GO TO Next Hit Forward New Bills Search Prev Hit Back HomePage Hit List Best Sections Help Contents Display
| Bill PDF | XML [Help] | Printer Friendly[Help] | Congressional Record References | Bill Summary & Status |
HCON 107 IH
March 7, 2012
Mr. JONES submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the JudiciaryWhereas the cornerstone of the Republic is honoring Congress's exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it
- Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except in response to an actual or imminent attack against the territory of the United States, the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress violates Congress's exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
I will post more articles as I find them.
PS I don't really think anything is going to come of this. Just found it interesting.
Oh I don't think it is going to go anywhere. If congress really wanted to fight the president's go to war power they would have done it in the courts. They did it once with Dellum v. Bush, but the court threw it out because the case wasn't ripe. They stated Goldwater v. Cater “a dispute between congress and the president is not ready for judicial review unless and until each branch has taken action asserting its constitutional authority.” They would have to do that and take it back to court. As far as I know they have not.
PS I don't really think anything is going to come of this. Just found it interesting.
Oh I don't think it is going to go anywhere. If congress really wanted to fight the president's go to war power they would have done it in the courts. They did it once with Dellum v. Bush, but the court threw it out because the case wasn't ripe. They stated Goldwater v. Cater “a dispute between congress and the president is not ready for judicial review unless and until each branch has taken action asserting its constitutional authority.” They would have to do that and take it back to court. As far as I know they have not.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





